Finally the proposal has been officially approved by the project sponsor.
The sponsor wanted to deal directly with us since it became clear that our partner would not add any value to the project. Once this has become official, the project sponsor wanted to deal only with us and that was what happened.
The project will still be stopped during August for vacations and we'll resume it in August 31st, with the new approved rules that came out from the budget cut.
Friday, July 24, 2009
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
Day 98 - New Proposal
The project is stopped, but there's still management work to do.
The political battle, with the consequent interruption in July, resulted from the fact that the proposal price was considered too high by the sponsor and our partner.
The project has been planned according with Data Fusion methodology and our know-how, which is over 10 years. I recall that we are data migration specialists, I don't have number but I believe there's not many people who have migrated as many banks as we did nor as faster as we do it. This said, we know what we're doing but obviously the sponsor, and unfortunately the partner, does not.
This said, the proposal has been presented according to what is most convenient to the client.
But this time we had to cut costs and in order to do it, we had to cut one resource. This means we've rethought the planing with one less specialist. But in order to do it, we had to force some constraints:
The main difference from our regular methodology is commodity for the client.
In the usual model, the client can request as many change requests as he wants and we, usually, accept that functional mappings are finished late in the project.
This has obvious advantages for the client in contrast with a limited number of changes and no late deliveries.
I think this is a great example were the client has not been well treated, since the price battle actually was more a problem for our partner than for the sponsor.
But the main goal has been achieved, the proposal is now cheaper, with an obvious cost.
The political battle, with the consequent interruption in July, resulted from the fact that the proposal price was considered too high by the sponsor and our partner.
The project has been planned according with Data Fusion methodology and our know-how, which is over 10 years. I recall that we are data migration specialists, I don't have number but I believe there's not many people who have migrated as many banks as we did nor as faster as we do it. This said, we know what we're doing but obviously the sponsor, and unfortunately the partner, does not.
This said, the proposal has been presented according to what is most convenient to the client.
But this time we had to cut costs and in order to do it, we had to cut one resource. This means we've rethought the planing with one less specialist. But in order to do it, we had to force some constraints:
- The client must give the functional mapping rules in up to three blocks. The first block must have the minimum required in order to be possible to execute the mapping. The second block must cover at least 75% of the rules and the third block must be complete.
- There's a dead line to deliver the last block. It depends with the complexity and development time of the area being mapped. It usually must not exceed 4 weeks after the first block delivery, which must be delivered by the end of the initial week of the area being mapped.
- The functional mapping deliveries must be of high quality. This means that there's a maximum number of changes programmed. This threshold has been calculated as 25% of the total number of mapping rules, e.g. a project that has 1000 mapping rules can have up to 250 change requests. If the client requests changes above the maximum number of changes planned, that will cost him extra.
The main difference from our regular methodology is commodity for the client.
In the usual model, the client can request as many change requests as he wants and we, usually, accept that functional mappings are finished late in the project.
This has obvious advantages for the client in contrast with a limited number of changes and no late deliveries.
I think this is a great example were the client has not been well treated, since the price battle actually was more a problem for our partner than for the sponsor.
But the main goal has been achieved, the proposal is now cheaper, with an obvious cost.
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Day 91 - Project Stop for Two Months
For political and economical reasons, management has decided to interrupt the project in July.This, added to the August vacations interruption, means that the project will be interrupted for two consecutive months.
This was totally out of the blue! The team just had come up from lunch and was told "no need to come tomorrow"!
This is also totally absurd, since even the project sponsor was a bit upset with this.
This was probably one of the worst examples I've seen where political wars have interfere with a project and the client directly suffered with it.
Unless there's some, also out of the blue, news against this, we'll be back only in September 1.
This was totally out of the blue! The team just had come up from lunch and was told "no need to come tomorrow"!
This is also totally absurd, since even the project sponsor was a bit upset with this.
This was probably one of the worst examples I've seen where political wars have interfere with a project and the client directly suffered with it.
Unless there's some, also out of the blue, news against this, we'll be back only in September 1.
Day 88 - Mappings at Cruse Speed
Insurance claims mapping is rolling at cruse speed and we're already implementing some of them.
There's already other areas eager to start the functional mapping, but we've decided to close the insurance claims before starting up new areas.
Since the due date has been shifted from October to April next year, the project sponsor decided to interrupt the project in August for a full month vacation. This makes sense since October was only possible if the sponsor, and ourselves, worked full time, meaning no vacation for anyone.
There's already other areas eager to start the functional mapping, but we've decided to close the insurance claims before starting up new areas.
Since the due date has been shifted from October to April next year, the project sponsor decided to interrupt the project in August for a full month vacation. This makes sense since October was only possible if the sponsor, and ourselves, worked full time, meaning no vacation for anyone.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)