The data migration strategy has changed again.
Now we will have 2 phases, and the first one will be slitted in two, making it an incremental data migration.
In phase One A, we will migrate clients and a big part of insurances that are wither active or that have accidents on it.
The phase One B, we will migrate the remaining insurances that are wither active or that have accidents on it, and everything related with those insurances.
And in the final phase, phase Two, we will migrate everything else, commonly known as historical data.
This will force me to implement control mechanisms in order to know which data will go in which phase. We will test this mechanism within a week or so in another big data migration.
Showing posts with label strategy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label strategy. Show all posts
Monday, February 7, 2011
Monday, September 6, 2010
Day 521 - Re-Plan
Today we have re-planned.
The new dead-line will be April 2nd.
This leaves a lot of time to develop and test things.
Unfortunately management is, in my opinion, doing a terrible mistake when it comes to testing. I've personally helped in the draft test document, where around 100 tests that covered the technical part of the data migration, things such as control counts and sums. I've officially stated, more than once, that the test document should be expanded with the business tests, which should be around the 100 test also. In short, the testing document should cover around 200 tests, minimum.
My professional opinion on this has been ignored, and management identified only 27 tests to be implemented. This is, obviously, insufficient. Only 13.5% of the tests that should be performed will not guarantee the data migration quality.
This is clearly a high risk, but management has been so under pressure due to the time delays that it is making the most old, common and newbie mistake of them all: cutting on quality.
This is entirely a client problem, since its business will have to live with the data as it has been migrated. Everybody knows how bad, dirty and erroneous data impacts a business, but management seems to be ignoring this.
It looks like time is not the only issue with this project. It seems that cost has slip 50% already. No wonder administration is now taking a closer look and paying extra attention to this project.
The new dead-line will be April 2nd.
This leaves a lot of time to develop and test things.
Unfortunately management is, in my opinion, doing a terrible mistake when it comes to testing. I've personally helped in the draft test document, where around 100 tests that covered the technical part of the data migration, things such as control counts and sums. I've officially stated, more than once, that the test document should be expanded with the business tests, which should be around the 100 test also. In short, the testing document should cover around 200 tests, minimum.
My professional opinion on this has been ignored, and management identified only 27 tests to be implemented. This is, obviously, insufficient. Only 13.5% of the tests that should be performed will not guarantee the data migration quality.
This is clearly a high risk, but management has been so under pressure due to the time delays that it is making the most old, common and newbie mistake of them all: cutting on quality.
This is entirely a client problem, since its business will have to live with the data as it has been migrated. Everybody knows how bad, dirty and erroneous data impacts a business, but management seems to be ignoring this.
It looks like time is not the only issue with this project. It seems that cost has slip 50% already. No wonder administration is now taking a closer look and paying extra attention to this project.
Labels:
data migration,
gis,
management,
migration,
strategy,
team,
tests
Day 517 - Back from Vacations
We've just came back from our vacations and we've just found out that things have taken a twist.
The GIS is still not ready, instead of speeding up it actually delayed, thus it should be ready by the end of September.
Also, as I though, administration gave management one last chance to make it. It looks that this time there will be watch points, where management will decide to continue, or cancel the project, depending on its status.
We already have a working plan for this week, which kind of makes it serious when management says this time is for real.
The GIS is still not ready, instead of speeding up it actually delayed, thus it should be ready by the end of September.
Also, as I though, administration gave management one last chance to make it. It looks that this time there will be watch points, where management will decide to continue, or cancel the project, depending on its status.
We already have a working plan for this week, which kind of makes it serious when management says this time is for real.
Labels:
data migration,
gis,
management,
migration,
strategy,
team
Day 486 - First Simulation is No-Go
The first simulation will not happen this weekend.
As predicted, things must be re-planned since the dead lines will be impossible to accomplish mainly because the GIS software is not ready.
I've just discovered that the claims area is still under development and should be ready somewhere around mid August.
The re-plan will be a though decision for the administration, since management will have to explain very well why a new re-plan is required.
I have the idea that management has one last shot on getting this project done. I believe administration will allow this, last, re-plan, and that it will be the last one.
The data migration team will now go on vacation for the entire month of August.
We expect things to be better when we get back.
As predicted, things must be re-planned since the dead lines will be impossible to accomplish mainly because the GIS software is not ready.
I've just discovered that the claims area is still under development and should be ready somewhere around mid August.
The re-plan will be a though decision for the administration, since management will have to explain very well why a new re-plan is required.
I have the idea that management has one last shot on getting this project done. I believe administration will allow this, last, re-plan, and that it will be the last one.
The data migration team will now go on vacation for the entire month of August.
We expect things to be better when we get back.
Labels:
data migration,
gis,
management,
migration,
strategy,
team,
tests
Day 482 - Really Bad News
The tests over the weekend when somewhat OK, but the first simulation of the data migration is compromised.
Things are still pretty unstable and there isn't a single test for validation defined. The first simulation will receive a no-go decision from me, and probably from management to, which means a re-plan will most probably occur.
Things are still pretty unstable and there isn't a single test for validation defined. The first simulation will receive a no-go decision from me, and probably from management to, which means a re-plan will most probably occur.
Labels:
data migration,
gis,
management,
migration,
strategy,
team,
tests
Day 479 - Another Data Set for Weekend Tests
We have set up a new data set for the weekend tests, but things are so delayed that the minimum conditions for the first simulation to happen.
In particular, there isn't a single test defined to validate the data migration.
In particular, there isn't a single test defined to validate the data migration.
Labels:
data migration,
gis,
management,
migration,
strategy,
team,
tests
Monday, July 19, 2010
Day 475 - New GIS Version Ready
The new GIS version has been installed but the data we've prepared has not been loaded.
A new request for the same data has already been made in order to load it over the next weekend.
Within two weeks from the, still planned, first simulation, the target system, GIS, is still unstable, the claims are not fully mapped, account is still untested and automatic tests are still on paper.
We are precisely were we where some weeks ago, when management showed that did believe on this plan.
A new request for the same data has already been made in order to load it over the next weekend.
Within two weeks from the, still planned, first simulation, the target system, GIS, is still unstable, the claims are not fully mapped, account is still untested and automatic tests are still on paper.
We are precisely were we where some weeks ago, when management showed that did believe on this plan.
Labels:
data migration,
gis,
management,
migration,
strategy,
team,
tests
Wednesday, May 5, 2010
Day 399 - Incremental Strategy Analysis
I've finished the requested analysis on performing the data migration incrementally.
Actually, it has a low impact for us because the requested split per product is already implemented and used on most of the data migration mappers. With less than three days work one can adapt the remaining mappers to use this strategy.
Actually, it has a low impact for us because the requested split per product is already implemented and used on most of the data migration mappers. With less than three days work one can adapt the remaining mappers to use this strategy.
Day 398 - Kickoff Planing of Migration Strategy
Management seems to believe that the current data migration will happen in the first weekend of October. We have met and discuss a lot about what needs to be done so that all the required tasks can be officially planed.
But the big news is not that management seems to believe on October as the dead-line. The big news is that management actually does not believe on that date as the final date. Management request me to evaluate the impact of an incremental data migration by product. They've said that this idea was fresh new, but they seem to believe that in October only half of the products will be ready on GIS and the rest will not be available for at least two more months. This new strategy will imply that one data migration will occur in October and another one will probably occur three months later, around January 2011.
But the big news is not that management seems to believe on October as the dead-line. The big news is that management actually does not believe on that date as the final date. Management request me to evaluate the impact of an incremental data migration by product. They've said that this idea was fresh new, but they seem to believe that in October only half of the products will be ready on GIS and the rest will not be available for at least two more months. This new strategy will imply that one data migration will occur in October and another one will probably occur three months later, around January 2011.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)